Offline
The original question that started this whole thing was, "Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a bear?" This is why the question is littered with flaws and ripe for people to do a whole bunch of mental gymnastics with it. If there was no mention of an encounter with the bear, then it would have to be said that there was no mention of an encounter with the man either. Stuck in a forest? With a bear (or man) out there that maybe you do or do not physically encounter?
There is no agenda, there is no narrative, it is not an argument, and definitely no mental gymnastics needed to see what the question and answers are trying to reflect. And, unsurprisingly, some men's responses validate the sentiment being alluded to in the question.
And getting stuck on "stuck", it is a common idiom, so it shouldn't be so hard to figure out what's meant by "stuck with", like "I'm stuck with this mortgage", "I'm stuck with this lemon of a car", "I'm stuck in this bar with Falcons' fans"...